1) I use “import” scope to define BOMs.

2) (I’m not a maintainer) I believe your pull request to enhance document
would be welcomed and will be a good start point for the discussion.

Regards,
Tomo


On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 02:11 #ZHAO LIDA# <lida...@e.ntu.edu.sg.invalid>
wrote:

> Dear Maven maintainers,
>
>
> we are studying Maven dependency specifications and we would like to offer
> several possible improvements for Maven.
>
>
> (1) The scope management of Maven is complicated and hard to distinguish.
> Maven maintained 6 scopes (i.e., compile, runtime, provided, system, test,
> and import). Compare to newer package managers such as NPM, which only has
> two scopes (i.e., dependencies, devdependencies), Maven has too many types
> of scopes, which makes it more difficult for users to understand. We went
> over all POMs on the Maven Central (around 8M artifacts, collected in March
> 2022) and count the frequency of all types of scope. Some of the scopes are
> rarely used. Only 0.35% of POMs in the Maven Center used system scope.
> Also, system scope is similar to provided scope, and import scope can
> hardly be regarded as a dependency scope. We suggest simplifying the types
> of scopes by merging system into provided and removing import.
>
>
> (2) In the documentation of Default Artifact Handlers (
> https://maven.apache.org/ref/3.9.3/maven-core/artifact-handlers.html),
> type and classifier should introduce more commonly used values as their
> default value to provide better examples. We found that the default values
> are rarely used and are not good examples for users to understand the use
> of the settings. Setting commonly used values as default can help users
> understand the usage of the settings. We went over all POMs on the Maven
> Central (around 8M artifacts, collected in March 2022) and count the
> frequency of all possible values of classifier and type. According to our
> research, in classifier, the default values have low frequencies, including
> tests (1.05%), javadoc (0.35%), sources (0.29%), and client(0.01%). More
> commonly used values are features (1.20%), linux-x86_64 (0.34%), and
> osx-x86_64 (0.27%). As for type, the top default values are pom (4.38%),
> test-jar (2.85%), war (1.08%) and the rest of the values are all below
> 0.1%. Other common examples are esa (2.53%), zip (1.88%), and xml (1.31%).
>
>
> Regards,
>
> NTU CSL
>
> --
Regards,
Tomo

Reply via email to