+1, guess it should be off by default and on in verbose/-X.
If user always want to see it or see only a subpart tunning is fine IMHO.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le jeu. 1 juin 2023 à 18:19, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net> a écrit :

> Howdy,
>
> well, am starting to think we should just use different loggers for these
> (by locality) and let users tweak logging as they wish?
>
> Or any other idea?
>
> Thanks
> T
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 2:44 PM Slawomir Jaranowski <s.jaranow...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > We have some of discussion about this feature in 3.9.2
> >
> > I saw some negative opinions ... Maybe I am missing something
> > I think that people's nature is that when they don't like something they
> > will speak about it ... but when people like something don't speak about
> > it.
> >
> > So I would like to say that I like it :-)
> >
> > Of course users can not fix problems in used plugins, but I see that when
> > we show those problems users start putting pressure on authors of plugins
> > to fix it.
> >
> > Now in 3.9.3 we will group internal - problems which users can fix and
> > external problems in plugins.
> >
> > By default we will show only internal violations in inline mode so
> external
> > violations will never be visible.
> >
> > now we have:
> > - NONE - no reports
> > - INLINE - internal violation in place where exist (default)
> > - SUMMARY - reports summary but only about internal ....
> > - VERBOSE - boths internal and external in verbose mode
> >
> > I would like to have an option to see internal as inline and external as
> > briev at the and of build,
> > Now I don't have possibility to display reports for external issues in
> > summary/brief mode
> >
> > --
> > Sławomir Jaranowski
> >
>

Reply via email to