On 12 May 2023, at 22:01, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Again, my main goal is to stir voters up. > And if unclear, of course I expect negative votes, but I DO EXPECT votes :D
My vague understanding here - if someone thus wanted to CANCEL the vote, the ruling would then still require it to be open for at LEAST 30 days before it could be cancelled, and another vote started. I've not read the full rules for awhile, but does anything preclude concurrent open votes? either way, -1 from me. I'd prefer faster turnarounds. --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
