Hi Guillaume, Nothing against (even the opposite) but do we have a clear status of what makes it an alpha? A kind of roadmap to final? The rational behind this question is that without it, it will likely look like a SNAPSHOT and will not be tested much but if it is considered alpha cause not well tested but "final" in the spirit it will get more traction IMHO.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 11 oct. 2022 à 18:19, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> a écrit : > I've splitted #819, extracted https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/820 > from > it and merged that part, so that's fine with me for a first alpha. > > Le lun. 10 oct. 2022 à 22:32, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> a écrit > : > > > The master branch contains a lot of things and has not been released for > a > > long time. With the new addition of the v4 api, I think it would be good > to > > get something out of the door to gather some feedback from users and also > > allow migrating some components and plugins to the new API. > > > > So unless there's an objection, I'd like to start a release process later > > this week after [1] and [2] are merged. > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > Cheers, > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/806 > > [2] https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/819 > > > > > > -- > ------------------------ > Guillaume Nodet >
