Let's do this for start.

Just "tone down" it.

T

On Wed, Jul 13, 2022, 20:04 Slawomir Jaranowski <s.jaranow...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> To summarize the discussion we have many votes to go this way.
>
> My proposition is as first step remove windows nodes from jenkins builds, I
> see many fals positive fails on such node ...
>
> Next step can be stop building PR by jenkins - it is only triggered  for
> dependabot and for branch from repo - not triggered for build PR for forked
> repo.
>
> sob., 2 lip 2022 o 21:42 Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net> napisał(a):
>
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I'd like to spin a discussion about the ASF Maven Jenkins instance.
> >
> > As you know, ASF Infra operates one separate instance of Jenkins only for
> > Maven related projects. Still, aside this being a chore for INFRA, it
> does
> > have quite some shortcomings:
> > - lack of all needed OS-es (has linux and windows nodes only)
> > - regular (lately more often) issues with windows nodea (like post build
> > workspace cleanup and others). But really, like 1 out of 3 fails due to
> > some windows node issue.
> > In short, it does not give us needed coverage, plus regularly generates
> > false negatives (red X) for PRs and master builds.
> >
> > OTOH, GH Actions proved very usable, quick, has macOS and in general
> fast.
> > Still, GH Actions cannot deploy snapshots to repository.a.o, nor is
> > something we'd want (see last npmjs token leakage).
> >
> > Currently we have this "duality" of CI, and almost always one has to
> check
> > why a job failed, and MANY times it fails due Jenkins non-build related
> > issues (usually on Windows nodes).
> >
> > Hence, I'd propose something along those lines:
> > - "scale down" Jenkins, keep linux nodes only, and make it "deploy" only
> > (preferably of master branch commits only)
> > - hence Jenkins would "loose" CI title, it would be just "deployer" to
> > repository.a.o
> > - use GH Actions for running tests on PRs and master branches and rely on
> > its results on GH UI
> >
> > This would give us (and ASF INFRA) benefit of:
> > - the maintained instance becomes way simpler, linux only (ASF INFRA)
> > - PR and master CI results come in way faster
> > - no more (well, GH Actions has outages as well, but less) false
> negatives
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > T
> >
>
>
> --
> Sławomir Jaranowski
>

Reply via email to