Thinking out loud, we can do it already using a classfiletransformer in classrealm for free for mojos, no?
Le jeu. 26 août 2021 à 15:08, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/blob/25e7195b6bff41c33b50986a32459a0df0706721/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/shade/resource/properties/SortedProperties.java > ;) > > Le jeu. 26 août 2021 à 15:00, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > >> Just FYI: >> >> https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-collections/apidocs/org/apache/commons/collections4/properties/SortedProperties.html >> >> Gary >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021, 03:20 Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > Correct. The average use does not care about sorting, so he won't be >> > affected by a constantly sorted output. They could remove date already >> > because it adds zero benefit to the output. >> > >> > I like your idea with the property to restore compat. >> > >> > Am 2021-08-25 um 09:13 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: >> > > Guess it is only useful if it is done in store() methods and not a new >> > one >> > > if we want to leverage it before >=8 years (2 more lts + a few) since >> API >> > > cant change for j8. >> > > Means the jvm could get a system property to disable the comments and >> > sort >> > > the keys and a new toggle on the properties object to do the same >> > > programmatically per instance. >> > > >> > > That said Im pretty confident it will not help maven. Only useful >> thing >> > is >> > > the escaping of props and it should be trivial to extract and reuse >> in a >> > > collector on j8 instead of using mjar or reflections which both have >> more >> > > cons and need the previous option anyway. >> > > >> > > >> > > Le mer. 25 août 2021 à 08:47, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> a >> > écrit : >> > > >> > >> Am 2021-08-24 um 16:24 schrieb Robert Scholte: >> > >>> FYI: A discussion has started on core-libs-dev mailinglist[1] about >> > >>> extending java.util.Properties with methods to store properties >> files >> > >>> in a reproducible way. >> > >>> If you have any comments, subscribe to the mailinglist[2] or ask me >> to >> > >>> drop the comments. >> > >> >> > >> * Date comment must go forever >> > >> * Using Optional is purely overengineered, null is more than >> sufficient >> > >> * Shouldn't it be "List<String> comments" for multiline comments? >> > >> * A comparator is a nice to have, but not a must. If it is trivial to >> > >> implement, why not? >> > >> >> > >> Finally, unless this is going to land in 11 or 8 as a backport, we >> won't >> > >> be able to use it in the next 5 years or so... >> > >> >> > >> M >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> > >> > >> >
