B please,

On Sat 19 Aug 2017 at 06:54, Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> so based on the feedback I will go back to INFRA and let them configure
> a separate Configuration type "Maven Issue Type Scheme" which contains
> the issue type "Dependency Upgrade"...
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> On 18/08/17 20:52, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > I have realized that in MASSEMBLY it is possible to define an issue Type
> > "Dependency Upgrade" which is very feasible for our projects...
> >
> > So I have asked INFRA[1] if we could have that for our other JIRA
> > projects as well....So the now we can decide between three options:
> >
> >
> > A) switch your other schemes to match MASSEMBLY - meaning in addition to
> > getting 'Dependency Upgrade' you also get add additional 30+ others you
> > dont use.
> >
> > B) Create a Maven Issue Type Scheme, adding 'Dependency Upgrade' to the
> > default.
> >
> > C) Nothing.
> >
> >
> > So I would vote for option "B" ...The question is what do you think?
> > Which options would you like to use in JIRA ?
> >
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Karl Heinz Marbaise
> >
> > More details in the issue.
> >
> > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14898
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
> --
Sent from my phone

Reply via email to