Le vendredi 2 janvier 2015 10:31:52 Baptiste Mathus a écrit : > Well, I for one find the x.y.z-nn somehow unusual. I'd prefer something > simple like x.y.z and I don't give a f*ck if some numbers are skipped. > > +1 with Stephen: I've never seen someone complain about missing versions > neither on ML nor IRL. Sure, I suppose people might wonder where the 4.x > went if the next mvn version was to be 5.0, but apart (and even though) > from the major version, I don't see any developer ever complaining about > that. > > Just then let's indeed have a changelog somewhere just for reference that > confirms that the x.y.foo was skipped and never released. see http://maven.apache.org/docs/history.html the fact that a version was never released is not explictely written, but since this is the official history...
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
