Am 2014-11-25 um 23:05 schrieb Paul Benedict:
We did this bug clean up before so this isn't new to me. However, I do
wonder if the resolution "Won't Fix" rubs people the wrong way? Maybe if we
had an "Abandoned" resolution that would sit better. Aside from reading the
comments in the ticket, it's not possible to know what was closed truly
because something is intended never to be fixed and what was closed due to
You mean: Status 'closed' and resolution 'abandoned'?
Feel free to open up a thread about the ticket transition workflow
(resolution field) we currently have. This is worth discussing.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote:
One postive response from MECLIPSE-196: Perfectly happy this was closed,
happy we're not using EARs any more. Can't wait to see new things coming
from takari.
Am 2014-11-25 um 22:22 schrieb Jason van Zyl:
I don't agree. This is a project, not a product and if no one looks at
something for 2 years then no one cares. We are not erasing the issues and
if someone does care enough to ask to reopen an issue then that's great.
But I've tried to purge down the list to something manageable twice now and
it keeps growing so I highly appreciate what Michael is doing because it's
unmanageable right now. And now that he's done that I have some motivation
again to look through the issues so kudos to Michael. Nothing stops anyone
from going through and reopening something, I don't think we need group
scrubbing sessions. I think core committers need to go through and help
curate the issues on a more regular basis.
On Nov 25, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Dennis Lundberg <denn...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi Michael
Unfortunatelly, I think that 2 years of inactivity is way to short time.
I
wish it wasn't so, but the reality is that the age of an issue is not a
good indicator of whether the issue is valid or not.
I think a better approach is to have joint bug scrub sessions, where we
join forces to manually check the validity of the issues.
--
Dennis Lundberg
Den 24 nov 2014 23:05 skrev "Michael Osipov" <micha...@apache.org>:
Hi folks,
I ran this query in JIRA: project in projectsWhereUserHasPermission
("Administer
Projects") AND updated <= "2012-12-31" and resolution = Unresolved and
type
= Bug ORDER BY created desc
Bugs which haven't been touched for almost two years. Total amount:
*1139*. A lot of them are still Maven 1.x related 8-).
Is there someone with bulk change abilities able to close those as
"Won't
Fix" with a note like: Big clean up end of 2014, you think that this
issue
still persists, reopen it?
What do you think?
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
http://twitter.com/takari_io
---------------------------------------------------------
the course of true love never did run smooth ...
-- Shakespeare
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
