Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> To answer the title of this thread simply; the ODF Adoption Committee
> at the OASIS consortium is trying to have everyone adopt the same
> icons. I think we will succeed in doing this if every ODF stakeholder
> plays even. 

Even if each one makes its own set of ODF icons this time around, rather
than application icons, it's a step in the right direction.  It may take
several iterations.

We already find, I hope, generic JPEG, PNG, PDF, and GIF icons on
desktops based on distro themes rather than specific applications.
ODF should be next.

IMHO every ODF stakeholder is playing even, but I do not include
Microsoft among the stakeholders.  For that interest group to gain the
status of stakeholder, its representatives must come to the table with
some credible evidence of good faith, strong enough to over come past
actions. Ignore them till they come to the table.  Odds are they won't
or else will try to pull more stunts like the recent hit-and-run with
the linux kernel.

> André does raise very legitimate concerns.

Kind of.  But they should be raised differently.  Charles, as you point
out, OOXML is DOA.  Left on its own, it would go away.  In fact, as any
who have followed the multiple scandals in most countries, it should
have gone away in 2006.  It's not implementable and served as a DOS to
consume and burn out XML and documentation experts worldwide.  XML devel
stopped when OOXML hit.  Though André is close, the threat is not OOXML
itself.

> - ODF's biggest challenge is its future. Right now MS and some of its
>   associates

That's the threat that André was trying to describe.  OOXML will go away
on its own but for active abuse and sabotage from individuals backing
Microsoft as if it were some kind of political party.  The threat to
open standards comes from Microsoft boosters near and far.  It's a
people problem.  Deal with those boosting or accepting boosting of MS
products.

Don't act surprised, this decommoditization of standards was outlined as
as strategy back in 1998 in the first of the 'Halloween Documents'
Mistakes like inaction and naive attempts at 'peaceful co-existence'
allowed the current problems to develop.

ODF stake holders can accomplish a lot in a short time.  We saw that
prior to 2006.

Regards,
/Lars

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to