Alexandro Colorado wrote: > At the same time, I dont think CA can afford to renew :)
IMHO, choosing M$ appear to not be about making money, it appears to be about pushing a single agenda. So whether they can afford to or not probably won't be a deciding factor. However, there is no denying that the maintenace cost savings brought by FOSS tools and the increased ROI brought by open standards will certainly get the attention of some people: MS boosters on the one hand, because it weakens their position. Business and technology users on the other, because it increases their possiblities. We can be marketing to the few instances where MSO is still a problem. OOo has no licensing costs and can be added along side MSO. With the rising need for universal office formats, and the inability of MSO to support said formats, OOo is needed even in legacy shops. -Lars --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
