Hi, Sara,

Though it doesn't answer your question, one place to examine is the list of Major OpenOffice.org Deployments: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Major_OpenOffice.org_Deployments

Actual market share is hard to guess, in part because OpenOffice.org is free to download and redistribute. One can get a CD or download it many times, or just once, and install it on many machines or none at all. Also, some sites are reluctant to draw attention from MS marketeers and avoid mentioning that they use it. Also, some larger businesses and institutions may have one or more site licenses for other suites, but still run OpenOffice.org in certain departments or in parallel.

In regards to market share, it might be important to start at the beginning with Visicalc and then Lotus 1-2-3 (even Quattro), and WordStar (and its predecessors) and WordPerfect. If you can get old, printed copies of general computing magazines from the 1980's and 1990's, BYTE was a good example, you can see from the advertisements how the market narrows. You can also see how a company used bundling (even illegal tying) and undercutting (even leveraging a monopoly) of prices narrowed the selection.

dBase and Foxpro, Harvard Graphics (aka Harvard Presentation Graphics) and Corel's Presentations also met interesting fates.

Use of undocumented, proprietary data formats have also played a very big role in acquiring and controlling marketshare. As have politics, one prominent company spends tens of millions in both the EU and the US in lobbying, those are just the declared sums. [1]

It would be very interesting to read your thesis. Will it be in English or Italian.

Best regards,
-Lars

[1] e.g.

Matt Loney. "Microsoft's lobbying budget 'outstripped Enron's'" ZDNet UK. 2002-02-12. http://news.zdnet.co.uk/business/0,39020645,2103784,00.htm

Ken Silverstein. "The Microsoft Network" Mother Jones. 1998-01-01. http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/1998/01/silverstein.html

Tobias Buck. "Microsoft seeks US backing in EU antitrust battle" Financial Times. 2005-11-14. http://news.ft.com/cms/s/37b7160a-5484-11da-826c-00000e25118c.html

Caron Carlson. "Abramoff Scandal Could Cast Pall On Tech Lobby" eWeek. 2006-01-13. http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1911081,00.asp

I'm not sure whether incidents like these below can be called lobbying or corruption:

Andrew Colley. "Democrats attack Gates' "charity"" ZDNet AU. 2004-06-29. http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/business/0,39023166,39151789,00.htm

Thomas C Greene. "Gates gives $100m to fight HIV, $421m to fight Linux" The Register. 2002-11-13. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/

Tom McNichol. "Virtual Philanthropy" Salon. 1997-01-01. http://www.salon.com/jan97/philanthropy970127.html

Scarlet Pruitt. "E-México favors windows over linux" InfoWorld. 2002-06-12. http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/02/06/12/020612hnemexico.html


Lars Noodén ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
        OpenOffice.org: Now ISO 26300 Standards Compliant !


On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Sara Tomasini wrote:

Dear Sir, My name is Sara Tomasini and I’m studying Net-Economy at the University of Trento, Faculty of Economy in Italy. I need some information about the desktop office suite market; in particular about OpenOffice’s market share in relation to Microsoft Office's one. These information are very precious for the first part of my master thesis that concerns with the situation of desktop suite market. Thank you for your attention. Kind Regards,

Sara Tomasini.
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale!
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to