Cor Nouws wrote:
Maybe a more *structured* investigtion on this question (MsOffice
addoption ODF is good or bad) could help??
Let's see what such an investigation would look like. The objective is
to estimate the sizes of two groups of people:
Group 1: People who would like to migrate to OOo but don't because MSO
doesn't support ODF.
Group 2: People who would like to stay with MSO but migrate because they
need ODF.
We want to know which group is larger:
* Group 1 includes everyone who thinks that OOo is worth the change
except but is worried about interoperability. That is, people who are
ready to migrate but are locked in.
* Group 2 includes the people who prefer MSO but feel compelled to
migrate to OOo because they require ODF.
Which group is larger? I'm confident that group 1 is much larger. OOo is
a very good product and the reason it has less market share than it
derserves is that people are locked in by a monopoly.
Best,
Daniel.
--
/\/`) http://opendocumentfellowship.org
/\/_/
/\/_/ ...and starting today, all passwords must
\/_/ contain letters, numbers, doodles, sign
/ language and squirrel noises.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
