Deepankar posted this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] list as part of another message:
"... here is an article at the Guardian about how there are few outside contributors to OOo: http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,16376,1660763,00.html . Pkus side - more exposure of OOo; negative side: shows that work needs to be done simplifying OOo so people can more easily help. " Here are some responses to the article: http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20051207203957628&title=A%20critique%20of%20OpenOffice.org%20and%20%26quot%3Bopen%20source%26quot%3B%20development%20methodology&type=article&order=&hideanonymous=0&pid=0#c388109 As an aside, the above thread was OT included in a Groklaw article "CCIA Calls on ECMA to Reject MS's Proposal". Refer to the parent article if you wish to read this. Back to OpenOffice.org and bugs. Andre posted a message wrt his concerns about the upcoming 2.0.1 release (http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=releases&msgNo=9151). You will need to follow the thread by looking for the messages with the subject "OOo 2.0.1 RC and software quality" and "Delaying the release (Was: OOo 2.0.1 RC and software quality)" as the threads are broken and cross-posted across several lists. Andre specifically asked input from those contributing to marketing. Regards Jacqueline McNally Lead, OpenOffice.org Marketing Project Are you a computer angel? (www.computerangels.org.au) Linux.conf.au 2006 (www.linux.conf.au) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
