It's now /much/ better - balanced, has an interview with Louis,
reflects the true meaning of beta - take a look at
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1854812,00.asp
S.
On Sep 2, 2005, at 02:24, Adam Moore wrote:
Thanks simon I appreciate it.
On 9/1/05, Simon Phipps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I contacted the editor just now and they say they will fix the
misleading headline.
S.
On Sep 1, 2005, at 19:44, Adam Moore wrote:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1854812,00.asp
This article here is a nice article, but the title suggests it being
a bad
review. I hope this was just a bad choice and not an attempt to get
readers.
--
Adam Moore
Community Volunteer
OOo blog: AdamMooreOOo.blogspot.com
<http://AdamMooreOOo.blogspot.com> <
http://AdamMooreOOo.blogspot.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Adam Moore
Community Volunteer
OOo blog: AdamMooreOOo.blogspot.com <http://AdamMooreOOo.blogspot.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
