The answer is "yes"! Thus, putting an additional "Yes" at the beginning of the statement should be fine.
Erwin
Daniel Carrera wrote:
If the answer is "yes", then may I suggest the following edit:
FAQ Question ============ May I add/bundle the Sun Java Runtime Environment to/with a (commercial) distribution of OpenOffice.org?
Answer ====== Yes.
Blah blah blah blah...
But I admit I found the answer somewhat confusing.
Cheers, Daniel.
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 03:19:39PM -0700, Eric Renaud wrote:
With an unbiased (really!) view, I see the answer clearly - yes -may be and can be distributed freely w. OO.o as long
as compliance with license is maintained and the license is included in the bundle,blah, blah, blah.
But the link to the Java licensing info is missing.
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Note: the following is intended as constructive feedback:
Uhhmm... was that a "yes" or a "no"?
Sorry to say this, but this text seems to dance around the question. It looks like all it said was "read the license". Maybe it was just me, but I didn't think I got an answer.
Also, this bit:
For more information on Java's licensing, please visit
Information on OpenOffice.org's license can be found at
http://www.openoffice.org/license.html.
That page doesn't seem to have any information about Java's license. :-(
Lastly, when you have a bracket inside a bracket, that's a sign that the text is a bit complicated. Don't take me wrong, I enjoy using nested brackets myself. But the Java thing is a sensitive issue and we probably want to go for clarity.
Thank you for doing this work Erwin.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
