Please file a proper SVN patch and create a Jira issue, Michal (like I hinted already in a private communication :).
Dawid On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for your input. To better proceed with these improvements, please > open an issue on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE and attach your > patches there. > > Uwe > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: [email protected] > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michal Hlavac [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 1:07 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: more generic lucene-morfologik integration >> >> Hi, >> >> I have little proposal for morfologik lucene module. Current module is >> tightly >> coupled with polish DICTIONARY enumeration. >> But other people (like me) can build own dictionaries to FSA and use it with >> lucene. >> You can find proposal in attachment and also example usage in analyzer >> (SlovakLemmaAnalyzer). >> It uses dictionary property as String resource from classpath, not >> enumeration. >> One change is, that dictionary variable must be set in MofologikFilterFactory >> (no default value). >> >> thanks, m. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
