On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> That removes a bunch of testing (replication with other dirs) and test checks…
>
> If you don't mind, I'd like to pull that test into a subclass test.
Oh, I see... I was going to say it seems like a big problem that the
directory factory causes no persistence (which is not what was
intended when many of these tests were written). But I see other
test methods that rely on persistence seem to be explicitly disabling
it themselves:
public void doTestReplicateAfterStartupWithNoActivity() throws Exception {
useFactory(null);
Seems like maybe what we want is MockFSDirectoryFactory instead of
MockDirectoryFactory in general?
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
