I'm not sure which would be the best way to do this. The main concern on SOLR-2079 was not make Solr or any of it built-in components depend directly on http, as Solr can be used in other ways (although, as I don't know much about Solr's UI, I'm not sure if this still applies here). Maybe you could add this extra information to the SolrResponse, and then move that to the HttpResponse headers in the writeResponse method of the SolrDispatchFilter, in a similar way that Solr is doing today with the exceptions.
Tomás On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Shawn Heisey <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6/3/2013 3:22 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > >> I don't think that's possible now. I recently had a need to access the >> request headers and there was no way to do it. I added a change to make >> the original http request to be added to the SolrQueryRequest context >> (SOLR-2079), but I don't think there is an option to do something >> similar with the response at this point (at least from what I see in >> SolrDispatchFilter). >> > > Do you have any advice about how I might expose what I need without > breaking anything? Perhaps it might be simply a matter of including a > NamedList with the headers/values that I need, similar to the way that the > file content is included, and accessing that object at the point where the > http response is built. Any pointers about where to put this code would be > awesome. > > > Thanks, > Shawn > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [email protected].**org<[email protected]> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
