[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13621147#comment-13621147
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4901:
-------------------------------------

Right, but i'm not sure its worth it to bring in native code just for this test 
(its cheating, and would complicate a lot of things in the build for this one 
guy).

i'm also unhappy with the test currently, because it doesn't even detect the 
bugs it was written to find (like LUCENE-4738).

                
> Unit test TestIndexWriterOnJRECrash does not support IBM Java 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4901
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4901
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: general/test
>    Affects Versions: 4.2
>         Environment: Red Hat EL 6.3
> IBM Java 1.6.0
> ANT 1.9.0
>            Reporter: Rodrigo Trujillo
>            Assignee: Dawid Weiss
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.2
>
>         Attachments: test-IBM-java-vendor.patch
>
>
> I successfully compiled Lucene 4.2 with IBM.
> Then ran unit tests with the nightly option set to "true"
> The test case TestIndexWriterOnJRECrash was skipped returning "IBM 
> Corporation JRE not supported":
> [junit4:junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterOnJRECrash
> [junit4:junit4] IGNOR/A 0.28s | TestIndexWriterOnJRECrash.testNRTThreads
> [junit4:junit4]    > Assumption #1: IBM Corporation JRE not supported.
> [junit4:junit4] Completed in 0.68s, 1 test, 1 skipped

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to