[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13616071#comment-13616071
 ] 

Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4891:
------------------------------------

I cannot reproduce it. I wrote this code:

{code}
Directory indexDir = new RAMDirectory(), taxoDir = new RAMDirectory();
IndexWriter iw = new IndexWriter(indexDir, new 
IndexWriterConfig(Version.LUCENE_50, null));
DirectoryTaxonomyWriter tw = new DirectoryTaxonomyWriter(taxoDir);
FacetFields ff = new FacetFields(tw);
Document doc = new Document();
ff.addFields(doc, Arrays.asList(new CategoryPath("type/CHAT", '/'), new 
CategoryPath("me"), new CategoryPath("network/hanirc/chan/#sdgsdgsd", '/')));
iw.addDocument(doc);
iw.close();
tw.close();

DirectoryReader ir = DirectoryReader.open(indexDir);
TaxonomyReader tr = new DirectoryTaxonomyReader(taxoDir);

// print the categories encoded for the document
CategoryListIterator cli = new 
CategoryListParams().createCategoryListIterator(0);
cli.setNextReader(ir.leaves().get(0));
IntsRef ints = new IntsRef();
cli.getOrdinals(0, ints);
for (int i = 0; i < ints.length; i++) {
  System.out.println(ints.ints[i] + "=" + tr.getPath(ints.ints[i]));
}

IndexSearcher searcher = new IndexSearcher(ir);
CountFacetRequest me = new CountFacetRequest(new CategoryPath("me"), 10);
CountFacetRequest network = new CountFacetRequest(new CategoryPath("network", 
"hanirc", "chan"), 10);
CountFacetRequest type = new CountFacetRequest(new CategoryPath("type"), 10);
FacetSearchParams fsp = new FacetSearchParams(me, network, type);
FacetsCollector fc = FacetsCollector.create(fsp, ir, tr);
searcher.search(new MatchAllDocsQuery(), fc);
System.out.println(fc.getFacetResults());

ir.close();
tr.close();
{code}

And it prints category ordinals:

{noformat}
2=type/CHAT
3=me
5=network/hanirc
6=network/hanirc/chan
7=network/hanirc/chan/#sdgsdgsd
{noformat}

And result:

{noformat}
[Request: me nRes=10 nLbl=10
Num valid Descendants (up to specified depth): 0
        me (1.0), Request: network/hanirc/chan nRes=10 nLbl=10
Num valid Descendants (up to specified depth): 1
        network/hanirc/chan (1.0)
                  network/hanirc/chan/#sdgsdgsd (1.0), Request: type nRes=10 
nLbl=10
Num valid Descendants (up to specified depth): 1
        type (0.0)
                  type/CHAT (1.0)]
{noformat}

As you can see, {{#sdgsdgsd}} returns a count of {{1.0}}.

I ran the code with and without the fix applied to LUCENE-4882 and it ran fine. 
Can you please review the code snippet and fix it so that it fails? It's best 
if you can attach a {{.patch}} file, with a (unit) test that fails.
                
> Only a part of CategoryPath is recorded if I add "me" category.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4891
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4891
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: modules/facet
>    Affects Versions: 4.2
>            Reporter: crocket
>
> If I add [type/CHAT, me, network/hanirc/chan/#sdgsdgsd] as "categories" to a 
> document and add the document to a writer as below, Only 
> "network/hanirc/chan", not "network/hanirc/chan/#sdgsdgsd "is" recorded into 
> a taxonomy directory. type/CHAT and me are recorded well. I confirmed it with 
> a test.
> FacetFields ff = new FacetFields(taxoWriter);
> ff.addFields(doc, categories);
> nrtWriter.addDocument(doc);
> If I add [type/CHAT, network/hanirc/chan/#sdgsdgsd] to a document, everything 
> is recorded fine.
> What's wrong with "me" category?
> You could clone git://snowberry.me/ZeroIrcLog.git and read the code if you 
> want.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to