[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13485115#comment-13485115
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4509:
-------------------------------------
I am a strong +1 for this idea.
I only have one concern, about the defaults. How would this work with laaaarge
documents (e.g. those massive Hathitrust book-documents) that might be > 16KB
in size?
Does this mean with the default CompressingStoredFieldsIndex setting that now
he pays 12-bytes/doc in RAM (because docsize > blocksize)?
If so, lets think of ways to optimize that case.
> Make CompressingStoredFieldsFormat the new default StoredFieldsFormat impl
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4509
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4509
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: core/store
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
>
> What would you think of making CompressingStoredFieldsFormat the new default
> StoredFieldsFormat?
> Stored fields compression has many benefits :
> - it makes the I/O cache work for us,
> - file-based index replication/backup becomes cheaper.
> Things to know:
> - even with incompressible data, there is less than 0.5% overhead with LZ4,
> - LZ4 compression requires ~ 16kB of memory and LZ4 HC compression requires
> ~ 256kB,
> - LZ4 uncompression has almost no memory overhead,
> - on my low-end laptop, the LZ4 impl in Lucene uncompresses at ~ 300mB/s.
> I think we could use the same default parameters as in CompressingCodec :
> - LZ4 compression,
> - in-memory stored fields index that is very memory-efficient (less than 12
> bytes per block of compressed docs) and uses binary search to locate
> documents in the fields data file,
> - 16 kB blocks (small enough so that there is no major slow down when the
> whole index would fit into the I/O cache anyway, and large enough to provide
> interesting compression ratios ; for example Robert got a 0.35 compression
> ratio with the geonames.org database).
> Any concerns?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
