I mean: "we don't mention system requirements correctly" - sorry ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -----Original Message----- > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] > Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 1:19 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2) > > Hi, > > +1 to release this time! > > - I ran smoketester on Linux (JDKs: 1.6.0_33, 1.7.0_07, server, 64bit), > passed! > - I used the PANGAEA index (version 3.6.1, copied from our production system), > ran checkindex on it (both JDKs) passed. Index size and deletions were > reported > correctly this time. I also checked an force-merged PANGAEA index, passed > also. > - I used IndexUpgrader to upgrade both 3.6.1 indexes, passed. > - I checked the output of IndexUpgrader again with CheckIndex, the output for > the force-merged 3.6.1 index was identical to the migrated 4.0 index (number > of terms,....) > - I compared the index sizes of the single-segment 3.6.1 and 4.0.0 indexes: > 4.0 > was slightly larger. You have to know that this index contains thousands of > fields (it allows to search in XML based on XQuery-like, so we have a field > for > every possible xpath of our rather complex XML schema in the index). The > search speed improved dramatically (because of the separate term dictionaries > for every field). In addition, so the bigger size is also caused by splitting > fields to > separate term dictionaries vs. one in 3.6. 4.0 also has more statistics. I > think an > index with 10 fields may be smaller, will try this a little bit later with > another > index > - I used the demo module to run some text-only queries, they passed. > > On small thing: We mention (in lucene's package), that Java 6 is needed, so we > should at least mention that in the release notes. We should improve our > docs/index.(html|xsl) to mention system requirements. Same for Solr. We have > a system requirements page on the website, but that is unversioned, so we > should also add a section for 4.0 there. But this is not the way to go. We > should > also mention that Java 7 is the preferred Java version, if you have 1.7.0_01 > at > least. > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 10:11 AM > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2) > > > > artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 > > > > Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found > > test bugs and other bugs! > > I am happy this was all discovered and sorted out before release. > > > > vote stays open until wednesday, the weekend is just extra time for > > evaluating the RC. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For > > additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional > commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
