[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13456882#comment-13456882
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-3997:
-----------------------------------------------
Steven, I think this is a good idea for the reasons you mentioned. I think the
new shared module should be named 'parent-child'. This name describes the
overlapping functionality both existing modules have.
Directory layout:
{code}
-- lucene
|
|--- parent-child
| |
| |--- grouping
| |
| |--- join
|
|--- ...
{code}
> join module should not depend on grouping module
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3997
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3997
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Affects Versions: 4.0-ALPHA
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 4.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-3997.patch, LUCENE-3997.patch
>
>
> I think TopGroups/GroupDocs should simply be in core?
> Both grouping and join modules use these trivial classes, but join depends on
> grouping just for them.
> I think its better that we try to minimize these inter-module dependencies.
> Of course, another option is to combine grouping and join into one module, but
> last time i brought that up nobody could agree on a name.
> Anyway I think the change is pretty clean: its similar to having basic stuff
> like Analyzer.java in core,
> so other things can work with Analyzer without depending on any specific
> implementing modules.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
