On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > not so much energy spent fixing these few shitty solr tests, some of > which (Like TestReplicationHandler) are totally useless and have been > failing sporatically for like, years.
Can you explain why it's useless (without the derogatory adjectives please)? I didn't write the test to begin with, so I don't know off the top of my head all of the functionality it covers. I'd be surprised if it was all redundant and covered by other test suites of course. Notes: - I remember it passing for *long* periods of time - I just ran it in a loop 30 times on my linux box and it passed 100% of the time, and in a timely manner - It *has* found many bugs when it started failing (i.e. usefull, not useless) - Many of us (including you) *have* worked to improve the situation over time when it does deteriorate - check the logs. It's not clear what you are suggesting (unless you are volunteering to look into this issue with OS-X apparently, or volunteering to write a new replication test from scratch or something). -Yonik http://lucidworks.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
