[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Hoss Man updated SOLR-731:
--------------------------

    Fix Version/s:     (was: 4.0)

Removing fix version since this issue hasn't gotten much attention lately and 
doesn't appear to be a priority for anyone for 4.0.  

As always: if someone wants to take on this work they are welcome to do so at 
any time and the target release can be revisited

In particular: i note that SolreCore.getCoreDescriptor and 
CoreDescriptor.getCoreContainer both seems to be fairly widely used now 
throughout the code base, so it's not clear to be that the intent/belief stated 
in this issue is still valid.
                
> CoreDescriptor.getCoreContainer should not be public
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-731
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-731
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.3
>            Reporter: Henri Biestro
>         Attachments: solr-731.patch
>
>
> For the very same reasons that CoreDescriptor.getCoreProperties did not need 
> to be public (aka SOLR-724)
> It also means the CoreDescriptor ctor should not need a CoreContainer
> The CoreDescriptor is only meant to be describing a "to-be created SolrCore".
> However, we need access to the CoreContainer from the SolrCore now that we 
> are guaranteed the CoreContainer always exists.
> This is also a natural consequence of SOLR-647 now that the CoreContainer is 
> not a map of CoreDescriptor but a map of SolrCore.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to