On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > >> BTW, fedora 16 has lucene 2.9.4 and does not have solr. Looks like F17 will >> have the same. I'd also be interested to know why they don't have 3.x or >> solr. > > I think that unrelated here, but the answer is simple: Those distributions > don't have Lucene JARS to provide "Lucene" as a library to the user, but they > provide Lucene as dependency for other packages . And those software is often > very outdated and Lucene 3.0 is no longer backwards compatible. Linux > distribs will adda "Lucene3" package once it is needed as a dependency. >
or their packaging system is just out of date. for example, in freebsd both are at 3.5 (so much more current) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/textproc/lucene/ http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/textproc/apache-solr/ -- lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
