I didn';t see a branch_10_5_1, so my backport was to branch_10_5 On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 7:39 AM Alan Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have back-ported https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16450 to the 10.5.1 > branch. > > Thanks Ignacio! > > On 5 Aug 2026, at 12:23, Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK, I just did that, thanks > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 7:12 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sure Michael, > > The fix looks well self-contained (and tiny), please feel free to backport it > to branch 10.5. > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 11:36 AM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > That bugfix was in https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16403/ > (commit: 2459ab7749c6062d0ee5a946430745c46cd9fda4) > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 6:33 AM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Is it possible to also include > > * GITHUB#16400: Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field > vectors formats, > including the default codec. Since 10.4.0 the merger tested the > per-field wrapper instead > of the unwrapped reader, so every merge rebuilt the graph from > scratch. (Jeho Jeong) > > this was a pretty bad regression I think, although indexing > performance only. It is lacking a CHANGES entry on main, sorry > (because the bug did not occur on main)! I can address that > separately > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 4:46 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > I spoke with Alan offline and I will be the release manager. I am planning to > build the release candidate tomorrow if there are no concerns. > > Thanks, > > Ignacio > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 9:31 AM Alan Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > We’ve identified a nasty bug in lucene 10.5.0, where boolean queries using > one of the doc-values based range queries as an exclusion clause can return > incorrect results (see https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16450). I think > this warrants a bugfix release, and I’m happy to act as release manager > (unless anybody else would like to volunteer :). > > We have a number of bug-fixes in the 10.6 changes section, but none of them > look to me as if they are major enough to need back porting. There are a > couple of performance bugs which could go either way but I’d lean towards > keeping the release as small as possible to get this fix out quickly. > > - Alan > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
