This would be great, do you know if this can be done without slowdown? On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 9:30 PM Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the nightly benchmarks may need to get beefed up with some > compiler output so we can better see what is happening? openjdk > supports many flags to print the compilation/inlining details. > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 3:08 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Nightly benchmarks caught up with this change, and got significant > slowdowns as expected: > https://benchmarks.mikemccandless.com/2025.08.13.20.38.43.html. > > > > It'd be good to better understand why it hurts so much and how it could > be fixed, help is welcome. :) > > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 8:39 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hello all, > >> > >> For reference, I just merged this PR[0] to luceneutil, which "pollutes" > call sites of DocIdSetIterator#nextDoc, DocIdSetIterator#advance, Bits#get > (live docs), SimScorer#score and others to better reflect what performance > may look like on a production system that handles diverse workloads. > >> > >> A consequence is that luceneutil now report worse performance. In > particular, nightly benchmarks are expected to get noticeable drops on many > tasks. This behavior in enabled by default but it is possible to disable it > by passing pollute=False when initializing a Competitor. > >> > >> [0] https://github.com/mikemccand/luceneutil/pull/436 > >> > >> -- > >> Adrien > > > > > > > > -- > > Adrien > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Adrien
