Thank you. I've applied 13315 to main, branch_9x and branch_9_11. Can't remember what changes.txt policy is - do we copy the entire section for 9.11 once it's cut back to main/ 9x?
Dawid On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 4:41 PM Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com> wrote: > Stefan sounds good. > > Sure Dawid. Thanks for moving it forward. > > Cheers, > > Ignacio > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 4:38 PM Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I would like to backport this change to unified highlighter to 9.11.1, if >> there are no objections. >> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13315 >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 9:37 AM Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_9_11. I am >>> planning to build the RC next Monday. >>> >>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch: >>> >>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue >>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take. >>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 9.11.1 >>> in GitHub, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as >>> Blocker >>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed >>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into >>> the current release branch. >>> * Only issues with Milestone version 9.11.1 and priority "Blocker" will >>> delay >>> a release candidate build. >>> >>> There are already three fixes backported to branch 9.11: >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13498 >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13504 >>> [3] https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13501 >>> >>> @Stefan you mention in another thread an issue with >>> StringValueFacetCounts but I see there is no fix for it yet, what's the >>> status there? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Ignacio >>> >>
