> Mike, your previous email suggests that you would like someone else to step 
> up. If that's correct I'm happy to be the release manager for both 8.11 and 
> 9.0.

Thanks, that would be very welcome!

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 1:33 PM Timothy Potter <thelabd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sounds like a good plan Adrien, thanks for nailing down some concrete
> milestones and dates :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Tim
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:04 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 Adrien.  Thanks for moving things along.
> >
> > ~ David Smiley
> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:30 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> For visibility, I recently opened a new issue about a case of index 
> >> corruption which is a blocker for 9.0. Nhat is looking into it.
> >>
> >> We've been discussing releasing 9.0 for a long time now and I think that 
> >> everybody agrees with moving forward, there's even some good momentum 
> >> around making the build and release tooling ready. So I'd like to propose 
> >> the following timeline for the 9.0 release to get some feedback:
> >>
> >> 2021-11-01: Feature freeze:
> >>  - branch_9x gets created from main
> >>  - branch_8_11 gets created from branch_8x
> >> This gives us ~2 weeks to do some last-minute work. The reasoning for 
> >> doing 8.11 as well is that we have some enhancements merged to branch_8x 
> >> that I suspect some users would like to see released in 8.x. Important 
> >> note: 8.11 will be the last minor release of major version 8. There might 
> >> be new patch releases in the future such as 8.11.1 or 8.11.2, but there 
> >> won't be a 8.12 or a 8.13.
> >>
> >> 2021-11-04: First RC for 8.11
> >> Since we had 8.10 not long ago, hopefully the release process will go 
> >> smoothly.
> >>
> >> ~2021-11-10: First RC for 9.0
> >> The date is indicative, the plan would be to move forward with the first 
> >> 9.0 RC as soon as the following conditions are met:
> >>  - 8.11 is out
> >>  - all 9.0 blockers have been addressed
> >>
> >> Mike, your previous email suggests that you would like someone else to 
> >> step up. If that's correct I'm happy to be the release manager for both 
> >> 8.11 and 9.0.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 11:54 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yes! I'm curious to give it a go, but getting pulled in many different
> >>> directions. If nobody else steps up, I will be free to shepherd the
> >>> release along in a  couple of weeks, assuming the current firestorm
> >>> subsides...
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:54 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > +1
> >>> >
> >>> > Blockers seem to be done with. So I guess we just need an RM to get the 
> >>> > ball rolling? :)
> >>> >
> >>> > I know that the Release Wizard in new Lucene repo needs some updates 
> >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9809 - I may help some 
> >>> > with that...
> >>> >
> >>> > Cross-ref other 9.0 release mail-threads:
> >>> > - "Now that 8.10 is out ... let's get rolling on 9!" 
> >>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r868028d42a19ae02d5bbe2e3329da26869045002b9bb4760b8056c56%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
> >>> > - "9.0 release": 
> >>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bef0af668860fdbfedb4b58261efd01d9fb26dc280915284c121065%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
> >>> >
> >>> > Jan
> >>> >
> >>> > 17. aug. 2021 kl. 11:13 skrev Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >
> >>> > +1 to your suggestions
> >>> >
> >>> > I just commented on LUCENE-9959 to suggest reverting since the changes 
> >>> > are currently half baked and I don't think that they should block 9.0. 
> >>> > There are no other blockers left to my knowledge.
> >>> >
> >>> > On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 6:24 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> 
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> It's been two years since our last release, we had lots of +1 when we
> >>> >> raised this last December, and IMO we are close to baked at this
> >>> >> point.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I checked JIRA and found two remaining Blockers
> >>> >>
> >>> >> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10016
> >>> >> VectorReader.search needs rethought, o.a.l.search integration?
> >>> >> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8638 Remove deprecated
> >>> >> code in main
> >>> >>
> >>> >> The first one is very close to resolved;
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On the deprecations, the issue has lingered for 1-1/2 years now, and
> >>> >> some progress has been made, but more work remains. Some new
> >>> >> deprecations have been added since it was opened too. Maybe we make a
> >>> >> concerted effort to clean out as much as we can, and then decide if
> >>> >> it's enough? Anyway this seems to be the only outstanding issue, so
> >>> >> let's see if we can make progress there
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Q: any other blockers?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Adrien
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Adrien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to