Thanks Alan, great suggestion.
I filed the following issue to track this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10115
-Chris.
> On 20 Sep 2021, at 16:14, Alan Woodward <romseyg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> The difference between the elasticsearch query parser and the built-in lucene
> one appears to be based around how they parse fuzziness, so I think the best
> solution here is to add another protected method, something like this:
>
> protected float parseFuzzyDistance(String input, float default) {
> try {
> return Float.parseFloat(fuzzySlop.image.substring(1));
> } catch (@SuppressWarnings("unused”) Exception ignored) {
> return default;
> }
> }
>
> Then handleBareFuzzy() can call out to this, and the ES version can overload
> it and do its own parsing.
>
> - A
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
