Added upgrade notes for the autoscaling stuff. Will begin the release process tomorrow when my GPG Keys will be refreshed in all of the apache systems.
- Houston On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > Doc changes are in. Still having trouble with that one link in 8x but just > fixed it locally and made sure not to push that change. > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:57 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 8x docs not building smoothly on my laptop... (without changes) >> troubleshooting, checking deps listed in README.adoc, etc. >> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:50 AM Houston Putman <houstonput...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Yeah, push it to branch_8_6. I have to document the upgrade notes for >>> the autoscaling stuff anyways. >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:27 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I realized after I went looking for it in the new docs that I didn't >>>> actually push the doc changes for MOVEREPLICA to 8x (had intended to verify >>>> that nothing differed in 8x before pushing). Doing that now, and suspect >>>> that we probably want to include it for 8.6.1 >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:20 PM Varun Thacker <va...@vthacker.in> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> > does the default autoscaling policy stay once they have upgraded? >>>>> >>>>> Looking at >>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/8e0eae2/#diff-de88ca16848af57d2474e04e26ea462cR90 >>>>> , it seems like just upgrading to Solr 8.6.1 will be enough. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:51 PM Houston Putman < >>>>> houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> So it looks like we all agree that 8.6.1 should be cut to fix this >>>>>> issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> Unless there's any alternatives proposed, early next week I'm going >>>>>> to push my branch_8_6 that has the offending commits reverted and some >>>>>> additional documentation on reverting the defaulted autoscaling policy >>>>>> from >>>>>> 8.6.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then I'll start the release process for 8.6.1. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please speak up if there is any disagreement. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Houston >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:40 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Absolutely, Ilan! Good idea. I initially hesitated in doing so >>>>>>> because Andrzej had a workaround in mind for them, so I thought it >>>>>>> would be >>>>>>> better if he did this. But, it makes sense to inform them of the issue >>>>>>> right away anyway. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Jul, 2020, 11:42 pm Ilan Ginzburg, <ilans...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Shouldn't we add a note right away to 8.6 notifying of the issue? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le mer. 22 juil. 2020 à 20:08, Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> a >>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Houston. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:51 PM Houston Putman < >>>>>>>>> houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > If we agree that this warrants a patch release, I volunteer to >>>>>>>>> do the release. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > I do think a patch release is reasonable even if users have to >>>>>>>>> take an action when upgrading from 8.6.0. I imagine most users haven't >>>>>>>>> upgraded to 8.6.0 yet, so if we make the patch now we will make life >>>>>>>>> easier >>>>>>>>> for everyone that upgrades between now and when 8.7 is released. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:50 PM Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Ignore this, I misread your email. >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:11 PM Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > Should we not revert the change so that users upgrading from >>>>>>>>> 8.6 to >>>>>>>>> >> > 8.6.1 get the earlier default policy? >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:09 PM Houston Putman < >>>>>>>>> houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > +1 >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > Question about the change. Since this patch added a default >>>>>>>>> autoscaling policy, if users upgrade to 8.6 and then 8.6.1, does the >>>>>>>>> default autoscaling policy stay once they have upgraded? If so we >>>>>>>>> probably >>>>>>>>> want to include instructions in the release notes on how to fix this >>>>>>>>> issue >>>>>>>>> once upgrading. >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > - Houston >>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:53 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >> > >> There was a performance regression identified in 8.6.0 >>>>>>>>> release due to SOLR-12845. I think it is serious enough to warrant an >>>>>>>>> immediate bug fix release. >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> I propose a 8.6.1 release. Unfortunately, I'll be unable >>>>>>>>> to volunteer for this release owning to some other commitments, >>>>>>>>> however >>>>>>>>> Andrzej mentioned in Slack that he might be able to volunteer for >>>>>>>>> this post >>>>>>>>> 27th. >>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >> Are there any thoughts/concerns regarding this? >>>>>>>>> >> > >> Regards, >>>>>>>>> >> > >> Ishan >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > -- >>>>>>>>> >> > Regards, >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > Atri >>>>>>>>> >> > Apache Concerted >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> -- >>>>>>>>> >> Regards, >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Atri >>>>>>>>> >> Apache Concerted >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Atri >>>>>>>>> Apache Concerted >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >> > > > -- > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > http://www.the111shift.com (play) >
