Jan, I agree strongly with your last point. And in case you haven't seen it before, there is a solr k8s operator, with a growing community, under development at https://github.com/bloomberg/solr-operator.
I agree that taking control of the solr docker images could be a good idea. That way, it could have larger involvement from the community and grow more organically with changes in Solr itself. - Houston On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 8:25 PM Noble Paul <[email protected]> wrote: > Why even "cluster mode" or "cloud mode"? > > Solr, by default , should use the cluster mode. So in all our > documentation, we should use just "Solr" and it should refer to a > "cluster mode of Solr" > > Wherever we don't have a "cluster mode" should be explicitly qualified > as "standalone Solr" > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 1:24 PM David Smiley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I hear you and sympathize but "SolrCloud" has been used long enough that > I doubt the trouble is worth it. I guess that makes me "+0". That said, I > think it wouldn't hurt to formalize "standalone mode" as-such and perhaps > say more explicitly that SolrCloud == "cluster mode" even if we don't > eliminate SolrCloud terminology. > > > > And as SolrCloud ... errr... "cluster mode" I mean, gains in usage > relative to "standalone mode", perhaps we can reference SolrCloud less > often and sorta assume that and instead make exceptions in documentation to > standalone mode specifics where we call that out as such. It's a loose > idea; I'm don't have an example in mind. > > > > Similar to the above notion, maybe "CloudSolrClient" could be more > invisible without renaming it. Imagine SolrClient.createFromZooKeeper() > etc. static methods that instantiate CloudSolrClient by default. Just a > thought. > > > > ~ David Smiley > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:19 AM Shawn Heisey <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On 9/30/2019 6:59 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya wrote: > >> > I propose that we rename SolrCloud mode to "cluster mode" such that > >> > there shall be "Apache Solr", running in either "standalone mode" or > >> > "cluster mode". We can effect this renaming 9.0 onwards, if we have > >> > consensus. > >> > > >> > I am open to any other proposal as well, so long as we drop the > "cloud" > >> > in the name. > >> > >> I see your point, but I think that "cloud" is so entrenched in the > >> overall consciousness of the software that changing it will not be easy. > >> > >> Maybe it might be something we could accomplish slowly, over the rest of > >> 8.0's lifetime and the entire 9.0 lifetime. Begin changing the > >> terminology we use in communication, start shifting documentation and > >> code, with a hard cutover in a later major version, perhaps 10.0 or > 11.0. > >> > >> The level of effort involved would be considerable, whether it happens > >> quickly or slowly. It might be the kind of thing we just don't want to > >> try and do. > >> > >> I'm not opposed to the idea, and I might even be able to help, but it's > >> going to need a lot of buy-in from those of us who work on Solr. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Shawn > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------- > Noble Paul > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
