cpoerschke commented on a change in pull request #300: SOLR-11831: Skip second 
grouping step if group.limit is 1 (aka Las Vegas Patch)
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/300#discussion_r313013808
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/grouping/distributed/responseprocessor/SkipSecondStepSearchGroupShardResponseProcessor.java
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.solr.search.grouping.distributed.responseprocessor;
+
+import java.util.Collection;
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.Map;
+
+import org.apache.lucene.search.Sort;
+import org.apache.lucene.search.TotalHits;
+import org.apache.lucene.search.grouping.GroupDocs;
+import org.apache.lucene.search.grouping.SearchGroup;
+import org.apache.lucene.search.grouping.TopGroups;
+import org.apache.lucene.util.BytesRef;
+import org.apache.solr.handler.component.ResponseBuilder;
+import org.apache.solr.handler.component.ShardDoc;
+import org.apache.solr.handler.component.ShardRequest;
+import org.apache.solr.handler.component.ShardResponse;
+import org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher;
+import org.apache.solr.search.grouping.GroupingSpecification;
+import 
org.apache.solr.search.grouping.distributed.shardresultserializer.SearchGroupsResultTransformer;
+
+public class SkipSecondStepSearchGroupShardResponseProcessor extends 
SearchGroupShardResponseProcessor {
+
+  @Override
+  protected SearchGroupsResultTransformer 
newSearchGroupsResultTransformer(SolrIndexSearcher solrIndexSearcher) {
+    return new 
SearchGroupsResultTransformer.SkipSecondStepSearchResultResultTransformer(solrIndexSearcher);
+  }
+
+  @Override
+  protected SearchGroupsContainer newSearchGroupsContainer(ResponseBuilder rb) 
{
+    return new 
SkipSecondStepSearchGroupsContainer(rb.getGroupingSpec().getFields());
+  }
+
+  @Override
+  public void process(ResponseBuilder rb, ShardRequest shardRequest) {
+    super.process(rb, shardRequest);
+    TopGroupsShardResponseProcessor.fillResultIds(rb);
+  }
+
+  protected static class SkipSecondStepSearchGroupsContainer extends 
SearchGroupsContainer {
+
+    private final Map<Object, String> docIdToShard = new HashMap<>();
+
+    public SkipSecondStepSearchGroupsContainer(String[] fields) {
+      super(fields);
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    public void addSearchGroups(ShardResponse srsp, String field, 
Collection<SearchGroup<BytesRef>> searchGroups) {
+      super.addSearchGroups(srsp, field, searchGroups);
+      for (SearchGroup<BytesRef> searchGroup : searchGroups) {
+        assert(srsp.getShard() != null);
+        docIdToShard.put(searchGroup.topDocSolrId, srsp.getShard());
+      }
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    public void addMergedSearchGroups(ResponseBuilder rb, String groupField, 
Collection<SearchGroup<BytesRef>> mergedTopGroups ) {
+      // TODO: add comment or javadoc re: why this method is overridden as a 
no-op
 
 Review comment:
   The 
https://github.com/cpoerschke/lucene-solr/commit/d4af896d511b10b40263ee5383ed633609ff7ff1
 commit turns this 'TODO' into method-level javadocs. Adding similar 
method-level javadocs for the `addSearchGroupToShards` method below made me 
wonder if
   * (a) the `super` method call in it could be omitted, and
   * (b) if emptiness of the relevant ResponseBuilder structures might be used 
as a way of determining that the 'second step' stage can be skipped?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to