[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16886592#comment-16886592
 ] 

Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-8920:
---------------------------------------

FYI: This is not related to my revert, I think a kuromoji dictionary data 
(o.a.l.a.ja.dict.TokenInfoDictionary$fst.dat) also should be reverted 
(regenerated) when FST version is reverted.
This works for me.

{code}
$ ant -f lucene/analysis/kuromoji/build.xml regenerate
$ git status
Changes not staged for commit:
  (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
  (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)

        modified:   
lucene/analysis/kuromoji/src/resources/org/apache/lucene/analysis/ja/dict/TokenInfoDictionary$fst.dat
$ ant -f lucene/analysis/kuromoji/build.xml test
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 33 seconds
{code}

> Reduce size of FSTs due to use of direct-addressing encoding 
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-8920
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8920
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Mike Sokolov
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Some data can lead to worst-case ~4x RAM usage due to this optimization. 
> Several ideas were suggested to combat this on the mailing list:
> bq. I think we can improve thesituation here by tracking, per-FST instance, 
> the size increase we're seeing while building (or perhaps do a preliminary 
> pass before building) in order to decide whether to apply the encoding. 
> bq. we could also make the encoding a bit more efficient. For instance I 
> noticed that arc metadata is pretty large in some cases (in the 10-20 bytes) 
> which make gaps very costly. Associating each label with a dense id and 
> having an intermediate lookup, ie. lookup label -> id and then id->arc offset 
> instead of doing label->arc directly could save a lot of space in some cases? 
> Also it seems that we are repeating the label in the arc metadata when 
> array-with-gaps is used, even though it shouldn't be necessary since the 
> label is implicit from the address?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to