[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16881010#comment-16881010
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on SOLR-13593:
--------------------------------------
Hi,
The changes seem trivial so I will be able to add necessary tests and commit it
in a few weeks, but before proceeding I would like to make sure the migration
roadmap for this change.
If the proposal gains consensus I think we also should start to consider
encouraging users to use "name=..." instead of "class=..." (so that we could
remove "class=..." in a future release to reduce the code complexity).
The first step to do so would be changing the default managed-schema file and
Solr Ref Guide to use "name=...", but I'm not sure about when we should do so.
Would it be better if we include the change in a 8.x release, or should we wait
until 9.0? Are there recommended ways/approaches for such migration?
> Allow to specify analyzer components by their SPI names in schema definition
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-13593
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13593
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: Schema and Analysis
> Reporter: Tomoko Uchida
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Now each analysis factory has explicitely documented SPI name which is stored
> in the static "NAME" field (LUCENE-8778).
> Solr uses factories' simple class name in schema definition (like
> class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"), but we should be able to also use
> more concise SPI names (like name="whitespace").
> e.g.:
> {code:xml}
> <fieldtype name="myfieldtype" class="solr.TextField">
> <analyzer>
> <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
> <filter class="solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory" protected="protwords.txt"
> />
> <filter class="solr.PorterStemFilterFactory" />
> </analyzer>
> </fieldtype>
> {code}
> would be
> {code:xml}
> <fieldtype name="myfieldtype" class="solr.TextField">
> <analyzer>
> <tokenizer name="whitespace"/>
> <filter name="keywordMarker" protected="protwords.txt" />
> <filter name="porterStem" />
> </analyzer>
> </fieldtype>
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
