It took me a few days to get back to this - the week got away from me and I 
wanted to give Jan’s suggestions a decent review.

Thanks, Jan, for those changes. It looks like it’s really one sentence that’s 
misleadingly wrong. I hate releasing with known errors like that, but if you 
don’t think it’s that big of a problem, I’ll go ahead with the release and fold 
your changes into 8.1. Maybe this is a good use for that otherwise unused 
Errata page in the PDF.

Thanks everyone who voted, the VOTE has passed and I’ll get started releasing 
it.

Cassandra
On Jun 3, 2019, 6:16 PM -0500, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>, wrote:
> Feel free as RM to release without these changes and fold into 8.1.
> But here is a patch with re-phrasing of the two paragraphs I mentioned, as 
> well as backport SOLR-12809, in case of a potential re-spin.
> https://gist.github.com/ed99d0945de112e05e1d1ff77772ce6a
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>
> > 3. jun. 2019 kl. 14:54 skrev Cassandra Targett <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Jan, would you please suggest exact wording to correct the error you 
> > pointed out (quoted below). Since I clearly don’t understand the change, 
> > and this is months delayed already, that is likely be the fastest option to 
> > get a respin started this week. Otherwise, it will need to wait for me to 
> > wade back into the topic to see if I can understand what the correct 
> > wording should be.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Cassandra
> > On May 31, 2019, 3:37 PM -0500, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>, wrote:
> > > Viewed on a smartphone :)
> > >
> > > Comments:
> > >
> > > Major changes section:
> > >
> > > > The Basic Authentication plugin now has an option forwardCredentials to 
> > > > prevent Basic Auth headers from being sent for inter-node requests.
> > >
> > > This is wrong. Basic Auth never sent basicauth headers inter-node, and 
> > > adding the “forwardcredentials” option lets user-originated requests be 
> > > forwarded with original basicauth credentials instead of PKI.
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to