[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16653292#comment-16653292
]
Gregor B. Rosenauer commented on SOLR-8339:
-------------------------------------------
I am upgrading an old 5.4.1 codebase and found there is no replacement for the
now removed method \{{ClientUtils.toSolrInputDocument()}}.
What's the correct way to handle this, without reimplementing the old code
(what's the point then?).
Maybe the patch should be extended to \{{SolrClient.add}} accept a
{{SolrDocumentBase}} instead of only {{SolrInputDocument}}?
> SolrDocument and SolrInputDocument should have a common interface
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-8339
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8339
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 5.5, 6.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-8339.patch, SOLR-8339.patch, SOLR-8339.patch,
> SOLR-8339.patch
>
>
> Currently, both share a Map interface (SOLR-928). However, there are many
> common methods like createField(), setField() etc. that should perhaps go
> into an interface/abstract class.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
