[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16549498#comment-16549498
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-8343:
--------------------------------------------
Hi [~alessandro.benedetti], it looks like there are some {{ant precommit}}
failures with the patch:
{noformat}
[forbidden-apis] Forbidden method invocation: java.lang.Long#<init>(long)
[Constructors for wrapper classes of Java primitives should be avoided in fav\
or of the public static methods available or autoboxing]
[forbidden-apis] in org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.fst.FSTCompletionTest
(FSTCompletionTest.java:34)
[forbidden-apis] Forbidden method invocation: java.lang.Long#<init>(long)
[Constructors for wrapper classes of Java primitives should be avoided in fav\
or of the public static methods available or autoboxing]
[forbidden-apis] in org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.Input (Input.java:57)
[forbidden-apis] Forbidden method invocation: java.lang.Long#<init>(long)
[Constructors for wrapper classes of Java primitives should be avoided in fav\
or of the public static methods available or autoboxing]
[forbidden-apis] in org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.PersistenceTest
(PersistenceTest.java:82)
[forbidden-apis] Forbidden method invocation: java.lang.Long#<init>(long)
[Constructors for wrapper classes of Java primitives should be avoided in fav\
or of the public static methods available or autoboxing]
[forbidden-apis] in
org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.analyzing.FuzzySuggesterTest
(FuzzySuggesterTest.java:971)
[forbidden-apis] Forbidden method invocation: java.lang.Long#<init>(long)
[Constructors for wrapper classes of Java primitives should be avoided in fav\
or of the public static methods available or autoboxing]
[forbidden-apis] in org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.FileDictionaryTest
(FileDictionaryTest.java:88)
[forbidden-apis] Forbidden method invocation: java.lang.Long#<init>(long)
[Constructors for wrapper classes of Java primitives should be avoided in fav\
or of the public static methods available or autoboxing]
[forbidden-apis] in org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.FileDictionaryTest
(FileDictionaryTest.java:110)
[forbidden-apis] Forbidden method invocation: java.lang.Long#<init>(long)
[Constructors for wrapper classes of Java primitives should be avoided in fav\
or of the public static methods available or autoboxing]
[forbidden-apis] in
org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.DocumentValueSourceDictionaryTest
(DocumentValueSourceDictionaryTest.java:508)
[forbidden-apis] Forbidden method invocation: java.lang.Long#<init>(long)
[Constructors for wrapper classes of Java primitives should be avoided in fav\
or of the public static methods available or autoboxing]
[forbidden-apis] in
org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.DocumentValueSourceDictionaryTest
(DocumentValueSourceDictionaryTest.java:538)
[forbidden-apis] Scanned 229 class file(s) for forbidden API invocations (in
0.06s), 8 error(s).{noformat}
which was a recent change to Lucene. Can you please fix these? Thanks.
> BlendedInfixSuggester bad score calculus for certain suggestion weights
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8343
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8343
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core/search
> Affects Versions: 7.3.1
> Reporter: Alessandro Benedetti
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: LUCENE-8343.patch, LUCENE-8343.patch, LUCENE-8343.patch,
> LUCENE-8343.patch
>
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently the BlendedInfixSuggester return a (long) score to rank the
> suggestions.
> This score is calculated as a multiplication between :
> long *Weight* : the suggestion weight, coming from a document field, it can
> be any long value ( including 1, 0,.. )
> double *Coefficient* : 0<=x<=1, calculated based on the position match,
> earlier the better
> The resulting score is a long, which means that at the moment, any weight<10
> can bring inconsistencies.
> *Edge cases*
> Weight =1
> Score = 1( if we have a match at the beginning of the suggestion) or 0 ( for
> any other match)
> Weight =0
> Score = 0 ( independently of the position match coefficient)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
