Hi all and thanks for the kind response, I will continue to push and be available at my best to support and speed up the review and contribution process from my side as much as possible! Just let me know for anything I could do to ease the community review task
Cheers -------------------------- Alessandro Benedetti Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director www.sease.io On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 same here. You communicate with the community in a clear and structured > way. Often a nudge or two is necessary for attention... > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > 11. jun. 2018 kl. 17:35 skrev David Smiley <[email protected]>: > > Although not a direct response to the issues you've raised, I just want to > say that your contributions are much appreciated and to keep up the good > work! Thank you. > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:00 AM Alessandro Benedetti <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> UP >> Any feedback from the community ? >> I would be more than happy to contribute these bugfixes/improvements. >> >> If any of them is not of interest/ has been superseded by other >> developments I would be equally happy to know and move on to other >> activities. >> >> Regards >> >> -------------------------- >> Alessandro Benedetti >> Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director >> www.sease.io >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Alessandro Benedetti < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> I have a lot of Lucene/Solr patches covering different areas waiting for >>> an initial review. >>> >>> *All of them have :* >>> *- Code change* >>> *- Related tests* >>> *- Pull Request in Github* >>> *- Patch attached* >>> >>> I am sure they are not perfect, but I believe they are ready for a >>> review. >>> Happy to work on the contributions and to fix/improve anything necessary. >>> >>> Some of them are bug fixes, some of them are improvements. >>> It's a couple of months I don't get any progress in the review process >>> for some of them, so I hope listing them here would help the community : >>> >>> *Bugs* >>> *[LUCENE-6687] <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6687>* >>> More Like This Bug >>> *[LUCENE-8343]* <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8343> >>> BlendedInfixSuggester >>> Bug >>> *[LUCENE-8329]* <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8329> >>> Size Estimator Bug >>> *[SOLR-12304]* <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12304> More >>> Like This Bug Solr side >>> >>> *Improvements* >>> *[LUCENE-8326 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8326>] *More >>> Like This Params Refactor >>> *[LUCENE-8347] <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8347> >>> *BlendedInfixSuggester >>> Improvement >>> *[SOLR-12238]* <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12238> Synonym >>> Query Style Boost By Payload >>> *[SOLR-12243]* <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12243> Edismax >>> Bug ( Elizabeth Haubert, me) >>> >>> Regards >>> -------------------------- >>> Alessandro Benedetti >>> Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director >>> www.sease.io >>> >> >> -- > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www. > solrenterprisesearchserver.com > > >
