[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16267500#comment-16267500
]
Varun Thacker commented on SOLR-11684:
--------------------------------------
bq. I don't know that there's any way for Solr to automatically detect that a
given filter query is really cheap and decide on the fly not to cache it.
LUCENE-7680 adds rules like a term query is always cheap . So don't cache it
> Solr should not cache cheap filters
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-11684
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11684
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Varun Thacker
>
> In the past I've seen clients who disabled the filter cache saw better query
> performance.
> I've never got the chance to investigate this unfortuinately.
> I was reading through
> https://lucidworks.com/2017/11/27/caching-and-filters-and-post-filters/ today
> and this section is something I wanted to revisit
> {code}
> cache=false – Tells Solr that we don't need/want this filter to be cached
> independently for re-use.
> This will allow Solr to evaluate these filters at the same time it's
> processing the main query
> {code}
> Lucene does optimizations like LUCENE-7680 (I think there are more which I
> can link later on). Maybe Solr should also consult
> UsageTrackingQueryCachingPolicy and not cache certain cheap filters?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
