[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049733#comment-13049733
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3205:
---------------------------------------
I am perfectly fine to remove it. For analysis and debugging NRQ, it would
still be good to have something, but I suggest to change the tests (I will
simply request TermsEnum and count terms, possibly on MultiTerms).
Should I take the issue and modify my tests?
> remove MultiTermQuery get/inc/clear totalNumberOfTerms
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3205
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3205
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 3.3, 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-3205.patch
>
>
> This method is not correct if the index has more than one segment.
> Its also not thread safe, and it means calling query.rewrite() modifies
> the original query.
> All of these things add up to confusion, I think we should remove this
> from multitermquery, the only thing that "uses" it is the NRQ tests, which
> conditionalizes all the asserts anyway.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
