I meant ‘re-spin’. :) -Anshum
> On Aug 29, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > > I should’ve noticed that. Will resin and start another thread. > > This vote is now cancelled. > > -Anshum > > > >> On Aug 29, 2017, at 2:16 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi Anshum, >> >> There is a 6.7.0 section in both Lucene's and Solr’s CHANGES.txt. I think >> you should respin after merging the entries there under 7.0.0 section (on >> branch_7_0, branch_7x and master; it should stay as-is on branch_6x). >> >> -- >> Steve >> www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/> >> >>> On Aug 29, 2017, at 4:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I don't think this is worth a respin, specially as this is a UI only issue, >>> but if others have a different opinion we can reconsider. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:48 PM Shawn Heisey <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 8/29/2017 11:36 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote: >>>> Please vote for the first release candidate for Apache Lucene/Solr 7.0.0. >>> >>> Is SOLR-11296 (assuming the problem can be located and fixed quickly) >>> too small for a respin? >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11296 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Shawn >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >
