+1 I think a 6.7 release would be very good. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:46 PM Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > Release early, release often! > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Solr and Lucene have had fixes backported to 6x (not 6.6) since the >> 7.0 label was set, most in Solr. Some of the fixes are useful "in the >> field", I've back-ported some of them myself. >> >> What objections are there to a 6.7 release? We'd always prefer to >> release nothing except important bug fixes on a prior branch, but the >> release process for 7.0 has taken some time and changes have >> accumulated. >> >> This might be the last, best time to wrap up 6x with a 6.7 as much as >> we can before officially releasing 7.0. >> >> What do people think? >> >> Erick >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > -- Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
