Thanks Steve, seems like we're really close. I'll be cutting an RC a couple of days after the last blocker gets resolved, just to give Jenkins some time.
Anshum On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 5:44 PM Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, SOLR-11183 is also a Blocker, I just put 7.0 as fixVersion so that it > will show up on the 7.0 Blockers JIRA query. > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Aug 4, 2017, at 8:28 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I’ve finished up addressing blockers. The only remaining one is > SOLR-10939: JoinQParser gives incorrect results with numeric PointsFields, > which Yonik is working on. > > > > -- > > Steve > > www.lucidworks.com > > > >> On Jul 25, 2017, at 7:02 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> I worked through the list of issues with the "numeric-tries-to-points” > label and marked those as 7.0 Blocker that seemed reasonable, on the > assumption that we should at a minimum give clear error messages for points > non-compatibility. > >> > >> If others don’t agree with the Blocker assessments I’ve made, I’m > willing to discuss on the issues. > >> > >> I plan on starting to work on the remaining 7.0 blockers now. I would > welcome assistance in clearing them up. > >> > >> Here’s a JIRA query to see just the remaining 7.0 blockers, of which > there are currently 12: > >> > >> < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved > > > >> > >> -- > >> Steve > >> www.lucidworks.com > >> > >>> On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> > wrote: > >>> > >>> I will *try* to get to it, but can't confirm. If someone else has a > spare cycle and can take it up before I get to it, please do. > >>> > >>> -Anshum > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM Cassandra Targett < > casstarg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I believe the only remaining blocker to SOLR-10803 (to mark all Trie* > >>> fields as deprecated) is SOLR-11023, which Hoss was working on. As he > >>> noted last night, he is off for vacation for the next 2 weeks. Is > >>> anyone else available to work on it so 7.0 isn't stalled for 2+ more > >>> weeks? > >>> > >>> Now would also be a good time to look over any other bugs with > >>> PointFields and make a case if any should be considered blockers for > >>> 7.0. I think they all share a label: > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hostetter > >>> <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> : So, my overall point is that if A) we agree that we want to > deprecate > >>>> : Trie* numeric fields, and B) we want to hold up the 7.0 release > until > >>>> : that's done, it's more than just updating the example schemas if we > >>>> : want to ensure a quality app for users. We still need to fix the > tests > >>>> : and also fix bugs that are going to be really painful for users. And > >>>> : to get all that done soon, we definitely need some more volunteers. > >>>> > >>>> I've beefed up the description of SOLR-10807 with tips on how people > can > >>>> help out... > >>>> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -Hoss > >>>> http://www.lucidworks.com/ > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >>>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >>> > >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
