[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16066303#comment-16066303
 ] 

Alexandre Rafalovitch commented on SOLR-10329:
----------------------------------------------

This Jira was supposed to support a sort-of rethinking of the examples from the 
ground up. Unfortunately, due to work and personal commitments, I do not 
currently have the time to do it. But I still think it should stay as a 
placeholder for this higher-level effort and/or for somebody else to add their 
overall thoughts.

In a meanwhile, for the specific items, I think we should have individual 
Jiras. 

> Rebuild Solr examples
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-10329
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10329
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: examples
>            Reporter: Alexandre Rafalovitch
>              Labels: gsoc2017
>
> Apache Solr ships with a number of examples. They evolved from a kitchen sync 
> example and are rather large. When new Solr features are added, they are 
> often shoehorned into the most appropriate example and sometimes are not 
> represented at all. 
> Often, for new users, it is hard to tell what part of example is relevant, 
> what part is default and what part is demonstrating something completely 
> different.
> It would take significant (and very appreciated) effort to review all the 
> examples and rebuild them to provide clean way to showcase best practices 
> around base and most recent features.
> Specific issues are around kitchen sync vs. minimal examples, better approach 
> to "schemaless" mode and creating examples and datasets that allow to create 
> both "hello world" and more-advanced tutorials.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to