[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15988496#comment-15988496
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10521:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 816b806d8ac81940ccb9681c3b4f1d8727a395f7 in lucene-solr's branch
refs/heads/master from [~mkhludnev]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=816b806 ]
SOLR-10521: adding sort=childfield(field,$q) asc for {!parent} query.
> sort by string field of the nested child when searching with {!parent}
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10521
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10521
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev
> Attachments: SOLR-10521.patch, SOLR-10521.patch, SOLR-10521.patch,
> SOLR-10521.patch, SOLR-10521-raw.patch
>
>
> The idea is to integrate Lucene's {{ToParentBlockJoinSortField}}
> The approach to hookup -it- is -a little bit tricky-:
> -{{sort=\{!childfield bjq=$q field=COLOR_s}desc}}-
> {{sort=\childfield(COLOR_s,&q) desc}}
> the question no.1 wdyt about the syntax?
> internally it creates a function query with valueSource which produces
> {{ToParentBlockJoinSortField}}
> The main challenge is picking Solr field type from
> {{ToParentBlockJoinSortField}}, because as-is it's broken on {{mergeIds}} -
> ByteRefs need to be properly marshaled and unmarshalled by a field type from
> the child scope.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
