[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15883703#comment-15883703
]
Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on SOLR-10177:
----------------------------------------------
bq. I think we should rename these two as: (a) "solr.tests.floatFieldType" as
pfloat or float, when used on a per field basis, or (b)
"solr.tests.floatClassName" as FloatPointField, when used in a fieldType
definition.
+1. I originally was planning on using those those system properties to define
the full class of the field type to use, but later I realized that was not
possible because the different types would have different attributes in the
schema definition.
> Consolidate randomized usage of PointFields in schemas
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10177
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10177
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Test
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>
> schema-inplace-updates.xml use per fieldType point fields randomization,
> whereas other some schemas use per-field. However, the variable name is
> similar and should be revisited and standardized across our tests.
> Discussions here
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?focusedCommentId=15875108&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15875108.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
