[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15875108#comment-15875108
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-5944:
--------------------------------------------
The other usages of were on a per field definition, whereas I wanted to use it
on a per fieldType definition.
The other usages, e.g.
{code}
<dynamicField name="*_fd" type="${solr.tests.floatClass:pfloat}" indexed="true"
stored="false" docValues="true"/>
{code}
seemed like mis-named. "pfloat" here refers to a named fieldType definition,
and not a "floatClass". Hence, I chose the other convention of
"FloatPointField" being referred to as "solr.tests.floatClassName".
To standardize, I think we should rename these two as: (a)
"solr.tests.floatFieldType" as pfloat or float, when used on a per field basis,
or (b) "solr.tests.floatClassName" as FloatPointField, when used in a fieldType
definition.
WDYT?
> Support updates of numeric DocValues
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-5944
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Assignee: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Fix For: 6.5, master (7.0)
>
> Attachments: defensive-checks.log.gz,
> demo-why-dynamic-fields-cannot-be-inplace-updated-first-time.patch,
> DUP.patch, hoss.62D328FA1DEA57FD.fail2.txt, hoss.62D328FA1DEA57FD.fail3.txt,
> hoss.62D328FA1DEA57FD.fail.txt, hoss.D768DD9443A98DC.fail.txt,
> hoss.D768DD9443A98DC.pass.txt, master-vs-5944-regular-updates.png,
> regular-vs-dv-updates.png, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch, SOLR-5944.patch,
> TestStressInPlaceUpdates.eb044ac71.beast-167-failure.stdout.txt,
> TestStressInPlaceUpdates.eb044ac71.beast-587-failure.stdout.txt,
> TestStressInPlaceUpdates.eb044ac71.failures.tar.gz
>
>
> LUCENE-5189 introduced support for updates to numeric docvalues. It would be
> really nice to have Solr support this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
